利用者:LorieGba432

提供: Ncube
移動先:案内検索

And they developed other traditions such as getting Chinese food at three in the morning. There was no-one they could be inspired by, no-one that they could learn those traditions from. Ever since I first was there, there was always at least one bed at the lab. It's a wonderful time of day to get ready to go to bed. So, the people who wanted to get lots of time would sign up for time at night when there were less competition, and this created the custom creation of a turnkey online casino hackers working at night. Several years later they wrote a timesharing system, and they added lots of hardware for it. That was exactly when a new KL-10 system was supposed to arrive, and the question was, would it run the Incompatible Timesharing System or would it run Digital's Twenex system. But after doing that, we were the ones best able to see what kind of improvements were feasible, and we were always talking to each other about how we'd like to see the system changed, and what sort of neat ideas we'd seen in other systems and might be able to use.

But what was the culture of hackers like aside from their anarchism? Essentially all the competent programmers except for me, at the AI lab were hired away, and this caused more than a momentary change, it caused a permanent transformation because it broke the continuity of the culture of hackers. Therefore hackers came in at night to be with their culture. During the daytime if you came in, you could expect to find professors and students who didn't really love the machine, whereas if during the night you came in you would find hackers. In the real old days our hackers used to modify the machines that came from Digital also. And the really old days, the beginning of the 1960's people used to modify computers adding all sorts of new instructions and new fancy timesharing features, so that the PDP-1 at MIT by the time it was retired in the mid-seventies had something like twice as many instructions as it had when it was delivered by Digital in the early sixties, and it had special hardware scheduler assisting features and strange memory-mapping features making it possible to assign individual hardware devices to particular timesharing jobs and lots of things that I hardly really know about.

In the old days, yes we had service contracts for the machines, but it was essentially a joke. Because if you let the field-service person fix it it would take them days, and you didn't want to do that, you wanted it to work. So, the people who knew how to do those things would just go and fix it quickly, and since they were ten times as competent as any field service person, they could do a much better job. 2. If one TaskTracker is very slow, it can delay the entire MapReduce job - especially towards the end, when everything can end up waiting for the slowest task. But one of the problems I had to face was the problem of proprietary software. The software of course worked, and it continued to work if nobody changed it, but the machines did not. I guess it is one of the disadvantages of VLSI that it's no longer so feasible to add instructions to your machines.

For example one thing that happened at the lab, after the hackers left, was that the machines and the software that we had developed could no longer be maintained. In the days of the PDP-1 only one person could use the machine, at the beginning at least. But in the beginning you just had to sign up for some time. It was actually a very beautiful thing to see a sunrise, cause' that's such a calm time of day. Now of course the professors and the students working on official projects would always come in during the day. But when the hackers all left the lab this caused a demographic change, because the professors and the students who didn't really love the machine were just as numerous as before, so they were now the dominant party, and they were very scared. And I may have done a little bit more living at the lab than most people because every year of two for some reason or creation of a turnkey online casino other I'd have no apartment and I would spend a few months living at the lab. The PDP-1 also had a very interesting feature, which is that it was possible to write interesting programs in very few instructions.